Skip to content

[SELECTED MATTERS]

What the work looks like.

Representative disputes, described by industry and by the questions at issue. We do not publish outcomes, amounts or the names of the parties: a description of how a matter ended tells a reader very little about a different case, and rather more about a client who did not ask to be discussed.

Squared stacks of cotton paper, a clothbound binder and a fountain pen on dark walnut
The record, squaredVessey Strand, New York
  • Asset management

    Trade secretsFiduciary dutyExpedited discovery

    For the respondent

    A dispute between a private fund and a former portfolio manager over who owned a trading model built during the manager's tenure. The questions were when the model became a protectable secret and whether the manager's later work drew on it at all. Our team designed the source-code review protocol and prepared the expert record on independent development.

  • Consumer goods

    ContractEarnoutPre-trial

    For the former shareholders of the seller

    An earnout dispute following the sale of a household products business, turning on what the buyer's covenant to use commercially reasonable efforts required once the market moved. We handled the contract construction briefing and built the documentary record of how the business was actually run after closing.

  • Energy

    Long-term supplyRegulatory litigationCross-motions

    For an intervening purchaser

    A disagreement over how costs were allocated under long-term supply agreements after a tariff change altered the economics for one group of purchasers. The issue was whether the allocation mechanism in the contracts survived the change or had to be read against the regime that produced it. We carried the contract-interpretation argument.

  • Healthcare services

    AntitrustExclusive contractingClass certification stage

    For the defendant

    A private antitrust action about exclusive contracting between a regional provider group and a set of commercial payors. The dispute concerned market definition and whether the exclusivity terms foreclosed rivals or reflected ordinary negotiating leverage. We prepared the economic evidence and the class-stage submissions.

  • Enterprise software

    LicenceAudit rightsArbitration

    For the licensor

    A licence dispute over the scope of audit rights and the way deployment was counted across a customer's affiliates after a reorganisation. The parties disagreed about which entities the agreement reached and what the audit clause permitted the licensor to inspect. We ran the documentary and technical record and the hearing preparation.

  • Family holding company

    Fiduciary dutyBooks and recordsSummary proceeding

    For the minority holders

    A books-and-records proceeding brought by minority holders of a closely held holding company after a series of related-party transactions. The question was what the holders were entitled to inspect and on what showing. We prepared the inspection demand and the affidavits supporting the stated purpose.

A fountain pen nib resting on heavy cotton paper under raking light
Nib and grainVessey Strand, New York

What we cannot show you.

Most of our work never appears on a website at all, and the matters that do appear here are described without the parts a client would recognise. If you want to know whether we have handled something like yours, ask us and we will tell you plainly.

Write us
VesseyStrand

Vessey Strand LLP

000 Example Street, Floor 00New York, NY 10000

Vessey Strand is a fictional firm built as a portfolio demonstration. The lawyers, matters and notes on this site are invented, and the address, telephone number and email address are placeholders.

Nothing on this site is legal advice, and sending a message through it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

© 2026 Vessey Strand LLP